Clinical Case Database / Category: Clinical Care
A challenging case of deliberate self harm/self injury in the young adolescent
Richard Dickson-Lowe BSc (Hons), MBChB, Kamalakannan Veeramuthu MRCSEd FCEM
Foundation Years Journal, volume 4, issue 10, p.45 (123Doc Education, London, January 2011)
This article gives a brief history of a deliberate self harm/self injury case in 2 young girls followed by a discussion about the management of the patients. Within the discussion a number of important factors will be briefly discussed including Gillick competence, capacity, confidentiality, child protection and the Acts that encompass all these issues (i.e. Mental Health Act, Mental Capacity Act and the Children Act). The reader is advised to refer to Trust and Local or National policies for further information.
Access the Clinical Cases Database
A subscription is required to read the full article. Please subscribe using one of the options below.
|Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database||£29.00||6 months|
|Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database||£39.00||12 months|
Richard Dickson-Lowe BSc (Hons), MBChB
Senior House Officer
East Surrey Hospital
Kamalakannan Veeramuthu MRCSEd FCEM
Consultant and Paediatric Lead
East Surrey Hospital
1. Harrington, R. (2001) Depression, suicide and deliberate self harm in adolescence. British Medical Bulletin, 57: 47â€“60.
2. General Medical Council (2009) Confidentiality. London: GMC. ISBN 978- 0-901458-38-4.
3. Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority  UKHL 7 (17 October 1985) from the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII) website.
4. Taylor, R. (2007) Reversing the retreat from Gillick? R (Axon) v Secretary of State for Health. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19(1): 81â€“97.
5. Mental Capacity Act 2005 (c.9). Part 1 â€“ Persons who lack capacity. Available at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents. Last
6. Children Act 1989 (c.41). Section 20 â€“ Provision of Accommodation for Children: general. Viewed at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/
ukpga/1989/41/part/III. Last accessed 29/09/10.
7. General Medical Council. (2008) Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. London: GMC. ISBN 978-0-901458-31-5.
8. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, NICE. (2004) Self-harm: the short term physical and psychological management and secondary prevention of self-harm in primary and secondary care. Available at www.nice.org.uk/CG016NICEguideline.
Conflict Of Interest
The Journal requires that authors disclose any potential conflict of interest that they may have. This is clearly stated in the Journal’s published “Guidelines for Authors”. The Journal follows the Guidelines against Conflict of Interest published in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf).
The authors of this article have not been paid. The Journal is financed by subscriptions and advertising. The Journal does not receive money from any other sources. The decision to accept or refuse this article for publication was free from financial considerations and was solely the responsibility of the Editorial Panel and Editor-in-Chief.
Patient Consent statement
All pictures and investigations shown in this article are shown with the patients’ consent. We require Authors to maintain patients’ anonymity and to obtain consent to report investigations and pictures involving human subjects when anonymity may be compromised. The Journal follows the Guidelines of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf). The Journal requires in its Guidelines for Authors a statement from Authors that “the subject gave informed consent”.
Animal & Human Rights
When reporting experiments on human subjects, the Journal requires authors to indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the HelsinkiDeclaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
About the Clinical Cases Database
The Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database is a selection of 600 peer-reviewed clinical cases in the field of patient safety and clinical practice, specifically focused on the clinical information needs of junior doctors, based around the Foundation Year Curriculum programme (MMC). The cases have been chosen to align with the Foundation Year Curriculum.
The database is fully searchable, or can be browsed by medical specialty. Abstracts can be read free of charge, however a subscription is required in order to read the complete cases.