Clinical Case Database / Category: Patient Management
Management Of Abnormal Menstrual Bleeding
Dr Alexander Field BSc MBB, PGCertMedED, MRCOG, Dr Sarah Jean Prince BSc, MBBS, Mr Chris Spencer MD, FRCOG
Foundation Years Journal, volume 8, issue 9, p.46 (123Doc Education, London, October 2014)
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) commonly presents in general practice and, although not usually associated with significant morbidity, it is associated with a significant impact on quality of life issues as well as financial costs to the National Health Service. Over the last 20 years, there have been significant improvements in the way that HMB has been managed: up until the early 1990s at least 60% of women with HMB would undergo hysterectomy - often as a first line treatment (1). With the advent of the Mirena Intrauterine System (IUS), most HMB cases can now be managed effectively in primary care. The development of conservative surgical techniques such as endometrial ablation mean that even those who fail to respond to medical treatment can still avoid undergoing hysterectomy with all of its potential complications.
Access the Clinical Cases Database
A subscription is required to read the full article. Please subscribe using one of the options below.
|Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database||£29.00||6 months|
|Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database||£39.00||12 months|
Dr Alexander Field BSc MBB, PGCertMedED, MRCOG
ST4 Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Basildon and Thurrock Univeristy Hopsitals NHS Foundation Trust Nethermayne, Basildon, Essex, SS16 5NL
Dr Sarah Jean Prince BSc, MBBS
ST3 Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET
Mr Chris Spencer MD, FRCOG
Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Mid Essex Hospital Services NHS Trust Broomfield Hospital, Court Road, Broomfield Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET
1. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health.Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Nice Clinical Guideline 44. s.l. : National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, January 2007.
2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. History and clinical coagulation screen. StratOG. [Online] Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2010. http://www.rcog.org.uk/stratog/ page/history-and-clinical-coagulation-screen.
3. Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System versus Medical Therapy for Menorrhagia. Gupta, Janesh, et al. January 2013, New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 368, pp. 128-137.
4. Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System vs. Usual Medical Treatment for Menorrhagia: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial. Sanghera, Sabina, et al. 3, March 2014, PLOS One, Vol. 9.
5. Effective treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding without organic cause: pooled analysis of two multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of oestradiol valerate and dienogest. Fraser, Ian, et al. 4, August 2011, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, Vol. 16, pp. 258-269.
6. Ten-year literature review of global endometrial ablation with the NovaSure device. Gimpelson, Richard. 2014, International Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 6, pp. 269-280.
7. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Radiologists.Clinical recommendations on the use of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) in the management of fibroids. s.l. : Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Radiologists, 2013.
Conflict Of Interest
The Journal requires that authors disclose any potential conflict of interest that they may have. This is clearly stated in the Journal’s published “Guidelines for Authors”. The Journal follows the Guidelines against Conflict of Interest published in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf).
The authors of this article have not been paid. The Journal is financed by subscriptions and advertising. The Journal does not receive money from any other sources. The decision to accept or refuse this article for publication was free from financial considerations and was solely the responsibility of the Editorial Panel and Editor-in-Chief.
Patient Consent statement
All pictures and investigations shown in this article are shown with the patients’ consent. We require Authors to maintain patients’ anonymity and to obtain consent to report investigations and pictures involving human subjects when anonymity may be compromised. The Journal follows the Guidelines of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf). The Journal requires in its Guidelines for Authors a statement from Authors that “the subject gave informed consent”.
Animal & Human Rights
When reporting experiments on human subjects, the Journal requires authors to indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the HelsinkiDeclaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
About the Clinical Cases Database
The Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database is a selection of 600 peer-reviewed clinical cases in the field of patient safety and clinical practice, specifically focused on the clinical information needs of junior doctors, based around the Foundation Year Curriculum programme (MMC). The cases have been chosen to align with the Foundation Year Curriculum.
The database is fully searchable, or can be browsed by medical specialty. Abstracts can be read free of charge, however a subscription is required in order to read the complete cases.