Clinical Case Database / Category: Clinical Care
Management of colorectal cancer: focus on population screening
Mohammed Nizamuddin, Marta Carpani de Kaski
Foundation Years Journal, volume 3, issue 4, p.47 (123Doc Education, London, May 2009)
Mrs CB, a 60-year-old female, presented to her GP with a 4-month history of tiredness and loose stools, having had a long life history of tendency to constipation, and weight loss (6 kg in the past 6 months). She has a family history of cancer though not colonic. Her past medical history was irrelevant. Mrs CB's GP suspected a gastrointestinal malignancy and referred her to the local GI department for investigation.
Access the Clinical Cases Database
A subscription is required to read the full article. Please subscribe using one of the options below.
|Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database||£29.00||6 months|
|Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database||£39.00||12 months|
Marta Carpani de Kaski
1. Department of Health. In: The new NHS. Modern. Dependable. London, 1997.
2. Thompson MR. ACPGBI Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis, 2002, 4:287â€“297. doi: 10.1046/j.1463â€“1318.2002.00348.x.
3. NHS Executive. Cancer waiting times: Achieving the two week target (HSC 1999/205), 1999.
4. Department of Health. In: Referral guidelines for suspected cancer. London, 2000.
5. OPCS. Mortality statistics, cause, England and Wales 1993. Office of Population, Censures and Surveys Department of Health. London: HMSO,1995.
6. Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population, JAMA, 2000, 284:1954â€“1961.
7. Greene F. Current TNM staging of colorectal cancer. The Lancet Oncology, July 2007, 8(7):572â€“573.
8. Simmonds PC. Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal cancer Collaborative Group. BMJ, 2000, 321:531â€“535.
9. Dube S, Heyen F and Jenicek M. Adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal carcinoma: results of a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum, 1997, 40(1):35â€“41.
10. Jonker DJ, Maroun JA,Kocha W. Survival benefit of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Cancer, 2000, 82:1789â€“1794.
11. Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer. NHS, Department of Health UK, 1997.
12. Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer England and Wales. NHS, Department of Health UK, 2004.
13. (www.health.gov.au/pubhlth/strateg/cancer/bowel/index.html) and the UK (www.cancerscreening.nhs/colorectal/pilot-evaluation.html).
14. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in high risk groups, British Society of Gastroenterology, 2002.
Conflict Of Interest
The Journal requires that authors disclose any potential conflict of interest that they may have. This is clearly stated in the Journal’s published “Guidelines for Authors”. The Journal follows the Guidelines against Conflict of Interest published in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf).
The authors of this article have not been paid. The Journal is financed by subscriptions and advertising. The Journal does not receive money from any other sources. The decision to accept or refuse this article for publication was free from financial considerations and was solely the responsibility of the Editorial Panel and Editor-in-Chief.
Patient Consent statement
All pictures and investigations shown in this article are shown with the patients’ consent. We require Authors to maintain patients’ anonymity and to obtain consent to report investigations and pictures involving human subjects when anonymity may be compromised. The Journal follows the Guidelines of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf). The Journal requires in its Guidelines for Authors a statement from Authors that “the subject gave informed consent”.
Animal & Human Rights
When reporting experiments on human subjects, the Journal requires authors to indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the HelsinkiDeclaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
About the Clinical Cases Database
The Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database is a selection of 600 peer-reviewed clinical cases in the field of patient safety and clinical practice, specifically focused on the clinical information needs of junior doctors, based around the Foundation Year Curriculum programme (MMC). The cases have been chosen to align with the Foundation Year Curriculum.
The database is fully searchable, or can be browsed by medical specialty. Abstracts can be read free of charge, however a subscription is required in order to read the complete cases.